Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoenaga Aramendi, Idoia
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-18T11:30:42Z
dc.date.available2016-01-18T11:30:42Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-30
dc.identifier.citationRevista de Dirección y Administración de Empresas = Enpresen Zuzendaritza eta Administrazio Aldizkaria (22):162-348 (2015)es
dc.identifier.issn2341-0108
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/16769
dc.description.abstract[EU]Lan honen helburu nagusia,Gipuzkoako udalen finantza kaudimena aztertzeaz gain, beraien arteko konparaketa bat egin ahal izatea zen. Beste modu batera esanda,egoera hobeagoan dauden udalak nortzuk diren identifikatu ahal izatea. Hasi aurretik bagenekien, ordea, udal baten finantza kaudimena ez dagoela faktore bat edo biren arabera soilik, eta gauza asko subjektiboak direla ere bai. Gainera, eragina duten baldintza guztiak kontuan hartzea ere zaila da. Kasu honetan, 9-10 adierazle aukeratu dira, ondoren udal bakoitzak besteekin konparatuz adierazle horretan lortutako zenbatekoa 1etik 10erako puntuazio batekin baloratu da, eta azkenik, udaletxe guztien ranking bat osatu da. Ondorengo lerroetan ikus daiteke ranking honen testuingurua,erabilitako metodologia eta egindako kalkuluen ondorio nagusiak ere.es
dc.description.abstract[EN]The main aim of making this project was, apart from estimating the financial solvency of the town halls of Gipuzkoa, is to be able to make a comparison between them. In other words, I would like to identify which cities or towns have a better financial situation than others. There was no doubt that the financial solvency of a town hall does not depend only in one or two factors, and a great deal of thing are quite subjective as well. In addition, it is difficult to consider every conditions that affect on the financial solvency. In this case, I have chosen 9-10, and the amount each town has got has been compared to others, in order to punctuate them from 1point to 10 points. Finally, we would get a complete ranking, where the city/town with the most points would be in first place. In the following lines, it can be seen the context of the ranking,the methodology used and the consequences we get from that work.
dc.language.isoeuses
dc.publisherEscuela Universitaria de Estudios Empresarialeses
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjectudaletxeakes
dc.subjectGipuzkoaes
dc.subjectfinantza kaudimenaes
dc.subjectrankingaes
dc.subjectaurrezki garbiaes
dc.subjectaurrezki gordinaes
dc.subjectzor biziaes
dc.subjectbalio erlatiboakes
dc.subjectzorraren itzultze epeaes
dc.subjectsuperabitaes
dc.subjectdefizitaes
dc.subjectlikidazioakes
dc.subjectfinantza kargaes
dc.subjectzorpetze mugaes
dc.subjectdiruzaintza gerakinaes
dc.subjecttown hall
dc.subjectfinancial solvency
dc.subjectranking
dc.subjectnet savings
dc.subjectgross savings
dc.subjectdebt
dc.subjectrelative values
dc.subjectdebt reimbursement period
dc.subjectsurplus
dc.subjectdeficit
dc.subjectsettlements
dc.subjectfinancial burden
dc.subjectborrowing limit
dc.subjecttreasury balance
dc.titleGipuzkoako udalen finantza kaudimenaren rankinga ratio aipagarrienen analisiaren araberaes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.ehu.eus/es/web/enpresa-donostia/eskolako-aldizkariaes
dc.subject.jelH700
dc.subject.categoriaPUBLIC ECONOMICS


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record