Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRistić, Bojana
dc.contributor.authorMolinaro, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorMancini, Simona
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-26T15:24:38Z
dc.date.available2017-09-26T15:24:38Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAgreement attraction in Serbian Ristic, Bojana and Molinaro, Nicola and Mancini, Simona, The Mental Lexicon, 11, 242-276 (2016), DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ml.11.2.04rises_ES
dc.identifier.issn1871-1340
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/22696
dc.descriptionPublished online 18 July 2016es_ES
dc.description.abstractAsymmetric number attraction effects have been typically explained via a privative markedness account: plural nouns are more marked than singular ones and thus stronger attractors. However, this account does not explain results from tripartite systems, in which a third number value is available, like paucal. Here we tested whether attraction effects can be driven by specific markedness sub-components, such as frequency/naturalness of use, using Serbian, in which participles can agree with masculine subjects in singular, plural and paucal. We first conducted a naturalness judgment task, finding the following naturalness/frequency pattern: singular,plural<paucal. In a subsequent forced-choice task, we presented participants with preambles containing a singular, a plural or a paucal headnoun (the castle[Sg] /two castles[Pauc] /the castles[Pl]) modified by singular/plural/paucal attractors (with the window[Sg] /with two windows[Pauc] /with the windows[Pl]). Three options were provided to complete the sentence (resembles[Sg] /resemble[Pauc] /resemble[Pl] gothic architecture).Both accuracy and reaction times (RTs) were collected. Accuracy data reflected the naturalness/frequency pattern, with paucal being the strongest attractor, and plural and singular attracting equally. However, reaction times showed a difference between singular and plural, suggesting co-influence of both frequency/naturalness and morphological markedness. We emphasize the necessity of re-defining markedness and testing attraction through different markedness sub-components (i.e. frequency/naturalness) to explain attraction cross-linguistically.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was partially funded by the P1_2014_1_38 (B.R and S.M) and PRE_2015_1_0320 (B.R.) grants from the Basque Government, the PSI2012-32350 and PSI2015-65694-P grants from the Spanish Government (N.M.), the Gipuzkoa Fellowship Program (S.M.) and by the grant Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa SEV-2015-0490.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherThe Mental Lexicones_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/PSI2012-32350es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/PSI2015-65694-Pes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/SEV-2015-0490es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectmarkednesses_ES
dc.subjectnumber attractiones_ES
dc.subjectSerbianes_ES
dc.subjectsubject-verb agreementes_ES
dc.titleAgreement attraction in Serbian: decomposing markednesses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2016. John Benjamins Publishing Companyes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://benjamins.com/#homees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1075/ml.11.2.04ris


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record