Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrápolli Sanz, María José
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-29T19:20:51Z
dc.date.available2020-01-29T19:20:51Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationTheoria 30(3) : 331-348 (2015)
dc.identifier.issn2171-679X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/39595
dc.description.abstractThis paper is an attempt to convince anti-realists that their correct intuitions against the metaphysical inflationism derived from some versions of mathematical realism do not force them to embrace non-standard, epistemic approaches to truth and existence. It is also an attempt to convince mathematical realists that they do not need to implement their perfectly sound and judicious intuitions with the anti-intuitive developments that render full-blown mathematical realism into a view which even Gödel considered objectionable (Gödel 1995, p. 150).I will argue for the following two theses: (i) that realism, in its standard characterization, is our default position, a position in agreement with our pre-theoretical intuitions and with the results of our best semantic theories, and (ii) that most of the metaphysical qualms usually related to it depends on a poor understanding of truth and existence as higher-order concepts. 
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherServicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleNon-Representational Mathematical Realism
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder© 2015, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record