Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLizarazu, Mikel
dc.contributor.authorScotto di Covella, Lou
dc.contributor.authorvan Wassenhove, Virginie
dc.contributor.authorRivière, Denis
dc.contributor.authorMizzi, Raphael
dc.contributor.authorLehongre, Katia
dc.contributor.authorHertz-Pannier, Lucie
dc.contributor.authorRamus, Franck
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-24T07:46:08Z
dc.date.available2021-02-24T07:46:08Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationMikel Lizarazu, Lou Scotto di Covella, Virginie van Wassenhove, Denis Rivière, Raphael Mizzi, Katia Lehongre, Lucie Hertz-Pannier, Franck Ramus, Neural entrainment to speech and nonspeech in dyslexia: Conceptual replication and extension of previous investigations, Cortex, Volume 137, 2021, Pages 160-178, ISSN 0010-9452, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.12.024.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0010-9452
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/50304
dc.descriptionAvailable online 3 February 2021.es_ES
dc.description.abstractWhether phonological deficits in developmental dyslexia are associated with impaired neural sampling of auditory information is still under debate. Previous findings suggested that dyslexic participants showed atypical neural entrainment to slow and/or fast temporal modulations in speech, which might affect prosodic/syllabic and phonemic processing respectively. However, the large methodological variations across these studies do not allow us to draw clear conclusions on the nature of the entrainment deficit in dyslexia. Using magnetoencephalography, we measured neural entrainment to nonspeech and speech in both groups. We first aimed to conceptually replicate previous studies on auditory entrainment in dyslexia, using the same measurement methods as in previous studies, and also using new measurement methods (cross-correlation analyses) to better characterize the synchronization between stimulus and brain response. We failed to observe any of the significant group differences that had previously been reported in delta, theta and gamma frequency bands, whether using speech or nonspeech stimuli. However, when analyzing amplitude cross-correlations between noise stimuli and brain responses, we found that control participants showed larger responses than dyslexic participants in the delta range in the right hemisphere and in the gamma range in the left hemisphere. Overall, our results are weakly consistent with the hypothesis that dyslexic individuals show an atypical entrainment to temporal modulations. Our attempt at replicating previously published results highlights the multiple weaknesses of this research area, particularly low statistical power due to small sample size, and the lack of methodological standards inducing considerable heterogeneity of measurement and analysis methods across studies.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported in part by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-0087IEC, ANR-10- IDEX-0001-02 PSL and ANR-11-BSV4-014-01), the EUR Frontiers (ANR-17-EURE-0017), Fondation Pour l’Audition (FPA RD-2016- 8 research grant).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherCortexes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectDyslexiaes_ES
dc.subjectAuditory processinges_ES
dc.subjectNeural oscillationses_ES
dc.subjectSpeeches_ES
dc.subjectMagnetoencephalographyes_ES
dc.titleNeural entrainment to speech and nonspeech in dyslexia: Conceptual replication and extension of previous investigationses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/cortexes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cortex.2020.12.024


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record