Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLo, Chia-Wen
dc.contributor.authorHenke, Lena
dc.contributor.authorMartorell, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Lars
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-19T09:05:24Z
dc.date.available2024-04-19T09:05:24Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationLo, CW., Henke, L., Martorell, J. et al. When linguistic dogma rejects a neuroscientific hypothesis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 725 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-023-00738-1es_ES
dc.identifier.citationNature Reviews Neuroscience
dc.identifier.issn1471-003X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/66802
dc.descriptionPublished online: 11 September 2023es_ES
dc.description.abstractKazanina and Tavano argue that delta- band oscillations cannot be involved in multi-word or multi-morpheme chunking during language comprehension because the timing of syntactic structure is too variable (Kazanina, N. & Tavano, A. What neural oscillations can and cannot do for syntactic structure building. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 113–128 (2023))1. According to the authors, comprehension requires the formation of hierarchically organized non-adjacent dependencies between words or morphemes that arrive at variable points in time. Temporally regular chunking would break dependencies and disable the comprehension of compositional meaning.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherNATURE RESEARCHes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.titleWhen linguistic dogma rejects a neuroscientific hypothesises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limitedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.nature.com/nrn/es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41583-023-00738-1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record