dc.contributor.author | Zahar Elie, G. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-29T14:39:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-29T14:39:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Theoria 19(1) : 5-30 (2004) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2171-679X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/39260 | |
dc.description.abstract | Structural Realism (SSR), as embodied in the Ramsey-sentence H of a theory H, is defended against the view that H reduces to a trivial statement about the cardinally of the domain of H, a view which arises from ignoring the central role of observation within science. Putnam's theses are examined and shown to support rather than undermine SSR. Finally: in view of its synthetic character, applied mathematics must enter into the formulation of H and hence to be shown axiomatisable; this is done in the Appendix, which is the most important part of the paper. | |
dc.language.iso | spa | |
dc.publisher | Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.title | Ramseyfication and structural realism | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.rights.holder | © 2004, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua | |