Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWeber, Erik
dc.contributor.authorBouwel, Jeroen van
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-29T17:24:48Z
dc.date.available2020-01-29T17:24:48Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationTheoria 24(3) : 301-320 (2009)
dc.identifier.issn2171-679X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/39405
dc.description.abstractPluralism with respect to the structure of explanations of facts is not uncommon. The pluralism which Salmon and others have defended is compatible with several positions about the exact re-lation between these two types of explanations. We distinguish four such positions, and argue in favour of one of them. We also compare our results with the views of some authors who have recently written on this subject.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherServicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleCausation, Unification, and the Adequacy of Explanations of Facts
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder© 2009, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record