dc.contributor.author | García Zabaleta, Omar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-30T19:06:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-30T19:06:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Theoria 34(3) : 441-460 (2019) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2171-679X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/39741 | |
dc.description.abstract | The DSM by American Psychiatric Association (APA) is the most relevant classification of mental disorders in the clinic and academic field. It is a manual that has been changing according to its context, although not always due to advances in scientific knowledge. The historical review of the manual’s successive editions shows its sociopolitical nature. Indeed ideological or political factors have been very influential in its configuration. These factors help to explain the properties of current psychiatry represented by the DSM-5 and understand the strong critiques addressed to it. | |
dc.language.iso | spa | |
dc.publisher | Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.title | La construcción del DSM: genealogía de un producto sociopolítico | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.rights.holder | © 2019 UPV/EHU Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1387/theoria.19779 | |