Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFernández Fernández, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz de Urbina, Jon
dc.contributor.authorLanda, Josu
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-28T10:05:11Z
dc.date.available2020-12-28T10:05:11Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationAnuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo 43(1-2) : 357-380 (2009)
dc.identifier.issn0582-6152
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/49440
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes some of the factors accounting for dative agreement drop in 19th and 20th century Lapurdian writers. Following Fernández and Landa (2009), a distinction is made between cases where dative agreement is apparently optional and cases where it is either obligatory or impossible. After describing obligatory agreement with experiencer and possessive/interest datives, section 3 addresses the situation found in complex structures. 3.1 examines dative causees, whose complex syntactic and thematic properties account for some of the observed instanced of agreement drop. On the other hand, in 3.2 we concentrate on datives thematically associated with the predicate in an intransitive copulative structure. Their failure to agree can result from the same agreement dropping factors examined before, but also from the absence of theta-transfer to the light predicate. In section 3.3 we turn to the transitive light predicate egin.
dc.language.isoeus
dc.publisherServicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleKomunztadurarik gabeko datiboen gakoez
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.holder© 2009, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record