dc.contributor.author | Valmala Elguea, Vidal | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-28T10:05:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-28T10:05:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo 43(1-2) : 951-970 (2009) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0582-6152 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/49476 | |
dc.description.abstract | One major concern of syntactic theory has been the identification of the structural position of adjuncts in the clausal architecture with the ultimate goal of explaining their properties in a number of respects. In this paper I concentrate on the analysis of central adverbial clauses, providing evidence that when in initial position they always appear in specifier positions, either in [Spec,TopP], as proposed in Borgonovo and Valmala (2009), or in [Spec,FocP]. Concerning their sentence-final position, I explore the traditional right-adjunction approach to the position of adverbials, the adjunct-in-complement analysis argued for in Larson (1988), Stroik (1990), Kayne (1994), and the adjunct-in-specifier approach defended in Baltin (2004) and Cinque (1999, 2006), showing that Cinque's (2006) analysis is more adequate on both empirical and conceptual grounds. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatearen Argitalpen Zerbitzua | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.title | On the position of central adverbial clauses | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.rights.holder | © 2009, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua | |