Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarrio Beraza, Irantzu
dc.contributor.authorArostegui Madariaga, Inmaculada ORCID
dc.contributor.authorQuintana López, José María
dc.contributor.authorIRYSS-COPD Group
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-04T18:25:29Z
dc.date.available2014-02-04T18:25:29Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-26
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Research Methodology 13(83) : (2013)es
dc.identifier.issn1471-2288
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/11342
dc.description13 P.es
dc.description.abstractBackground: In medical practice many, essentially continuous, clinical parameters tend to be categorised by physicians for ease of decision-making. Indeed, categorisation is a common practice both in medical research and in the development of clinical prediction rules, particularly where the ensuing models are to be applied in daily clinical practice to support clinicians in the decision-making process. Since the number of categories into which a continuous predictor must be categorised depends partly on the relationship between the predictor and the outcome, the need for more than two categories must be borne in mind. -- Methods: We propose a categorisation methodology for clinical-prediction models, using Generalised Additive Models (GAMs) with P-spline smoothers to determine the relationship between the continuous predictor and the outcome. The proposed method consists of creating at least one average-risk category along with high-and low-risk categories based on the GAM smooth function. We applied this methodology to a prospective cohort of patients with exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The predictors selected were respiratory rate and partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the blood (PCO2), and the response variable was poor evolution. An additive logistic regression model was used to show the relationship between the covariates and the dichotomous response variable. The proposed categorisation was compared to the continuous predictor as the best option, using the AIC and AUC evaluation parameters. The sample was divided into a derivation (60%) and validation (40%) samples. The first was used to obtain the cut points while the second was used to validate the proposed methodology. -- Results: The three-category proposal for the respiratory rate was <= 20;(20, 24];> 24, for which the following values were obtained: AIC=314.5 and AUC=0.638. The respective values for the continuous predictor were AIC=317.1 and AUC=0.634, with no statistically significant differences being found between the two AUCs (p = 0.079). The four-category proposal for PCO2 was <= 43;(43, 52];(52, 65];> 65, for which the following values were obtained: AIC=258.1 and AUC=0.81. No statistically significant differences were found between the AUC of the four-category option and that of the continuous predictor, which yielded an AIC of 250.3 and an AUC of 0.825 (p = 0.115). -- Conclusions: Our proposed method provides clinicians with the number and location of cut points for categorising variables, and performs as successfully as the original continuous predictor when it comes to developing clinical prediction ruleses
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by grants UE+09/62, MTM2010-14913, GIU10/21, 2012111008, IT620-13 and UFI11/52. The work of IB was supported by grant GIU10/21 from the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU and the CIBER en EpidemiologIa y Salud Publica (CIBERESP). The collection of the COPD data used for this study was supported in part by grants from the Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (PI 061010, PI061017, PI06714, PI060326 and PI060664), Basque Country Regional Health Authority, Galdakao Hospital Research Committee and the thematic networks-Red IRYSS (Investigacion en Resultados y Servicios Sanitarios)- of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (G03/220). The authors declare that there were no conflicts of interest and, lastly, would like to thank Maria Xose Rodriguez-Alvarez for her invaluable help with the implementation of the R code, Michael Benedict for revising the English and the referees and the associate editor for providing thoughtful comments and suggestions which led to substantial improvement of the presentation of the material in this article.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherBioMed Centrales
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjectsplineses
dc.subjectcurveses
dc.titleUse of generalised additive models to categorise continuous variables in clinical predictiones
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2013 Barrio et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/13/83es
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2288-13-83
dc.departamentoesMatemática Aplicada, Estadística e Investigación Operativaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuMatematika aplikatua eta estatistikaes_ES
dc.subject.categoriaEPIDEMIOLOGY


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record