Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPittel, Karenes
dc.contributor.authorRübbelke, Dirkes
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-23T10:36:48Z
dc.date.available2015-01-23T10:36:48Z
dc.date.issued2010-10-25es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/14218
dc.description33 p.es
dc.description.abstractThe paper analyzes the implications of local and global pollution when two types of abatement activities can be undertaken. One type reduces solely local pollution (e.g., use of particulate matter filters) while the other mitigates global pollution as well (e.g., application of fuel saving technologies). In the framework of a 2-country endogenous growth model, the implications of different assumptions about the degree to which global externalities are internalized are analyzed. Subsequently, we derive policy rules adapted to the different scenarios. Special attention is paid to pollution, growth and optimal policy in the case of asymmetric internalization.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherBasque Centre for Climate Change/Klima Aldaketa Ikergaies
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBC3 Working Paper;2010-15es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjecteconomic growthes
dc.subjectglobal and local externalitieses
dc.subjectgovernment policieses
dc.titleLocal and Global Externalities, Environmental Policies and Growthes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperes
dc.rights.holder©BC3es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.bc3research.org/workingpapers/2010-15.htmles


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record