Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBonet, Lucia
dc.contributor.authorLlácer, Blanca
dc.contributor.authorHernandez-Viadel, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorArce, David
dc.contributor.authorBlanquer, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorCañete, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorEscartí, Maria
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Pinto Arrillaga, Ana María ORCID
dc.contributor.authorSanjuán, Julio
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-22T13:39:30Z
dc.date.available2018-11-22T13:39:30Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-25
dc.identifier.citationJMIR Mental Health 5(2) : (2018) // Article ID UNSP e51es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2368-7959
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/29747
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite a growing interest in the use of technology in order to support the treatment of psychotic disorders, limited knowledge exists about the viability and acceptability of these eHealth interventions in relation to the clinical characteristics of patients. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the access and use of, as well as experiences and interest in, new technologies using a survey of patients diagnosed with early psychosis compared with a survey of patients diagnosed with chronic psychotic disorders. Methods: We designed a structured questionnaire This questionnaire was divided into five parts: (1) clinical and demographic information, (2) access and use of the internet, (3) use of the internet in relation to mental health, (4) experiences with technology, and (5) patients' interest in eHealth services. In total, 105 patients were recruited from early psychosis units (n=65) and recovery units (n=40). Results: In this study, 84.8% (89/105) of the patients had access to the internet and 88.6% (93/105) owned an electronic internet device. In total, 71.3% (57/80) of patients who owned a mobile phone were interested in eHealth systems and 38.2% (37/97) reported negative experiences related to the internet usage. We observed differences between the groups in terms of device ownership (P=.02), the frequency of internet access (P<.001), the use of social media (P=.01), and seeking health information (P=.04); the differences were found to be higher in the early psychosis group. No differences were found between the groups in terms of the use of internet in relation to mental health, experiences and opinions about the internet, or interest in eHealth interventions (P=.43). Conclusions: The availability and use of technology for the participants in our survey were equivalent to those for the general population. The differences found between the groups in relation to the access or use of technology seemed to due to age-related factors. The use of technology involving mental health and the interest in eHealth interventions were mainly positive and equivalent between the groups. Accordingly, this group of patients is a potential target for the emerging eHealth interventions, regardless of their clinical status. However, 28.7% (23/80) of the studied patients rejected the use of internet interventions and 38.2% (37/97) had unpleasant experiences related to its usage; thus, more in-depth studies are needed to better define the profile of patients with psychosis who may benefit from eHealth treatments.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO/2016/082 grant) and CIBERSAM and Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (PI01399, PI13/00447; PI17/00402, Cofunded FEDER).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherJMIR Publicationses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjecteHealthes_ES
dc.subjectinternetes_ES
dc.subjectmobile phonees_ES
dc.subjectviabilityes_ES
dc.subjectacceptabilityes_ES
dc.subjectpsychosises_ES
dc.subjectschizophreniaes_ES
dc.subjectinternet usees_ES
dc.subjectmental-illnesses_ES
dc.subjectschizophreniaes_ES
dc.subjectpeoplees_ES
dc.subjectmetaanalysises_ES
dc.subjectphonees_ES
dc.subjectinterventiones_ES
dc.subjectinformationes_ES
dc.subjectmediaes_ES
dc.titleDifferences in the Use and Opinions About New eHealth Technologies Among Patients With Psychosis: Structured Questionnairees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holderLucia Bonet, Blanca Llácer, Miguel Hernandez-Viadel, David Arce, Ignacio Blanquer, Carlos Cañete, Maria Escartí, Ana M González-Pinto, Julio Sanjuán. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 25.07.2018. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://mental.jmir.org/2018/3/e51/es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/mental.9950
dc.departamentoesNeurocienciases_ES
dc.departamentoeuNeurozientziakes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Lucia Bonet, Blanca Llácer, Miguel Hernandez-Viadel, David Arce, Ignacio Blanquer, Carlos Cañete, Maria Escartí, Ana M González-Pinto, Julio Sanjuán. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 25.07.2018.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Lucia Bonet, Blanca Llácer, Miguel Hernandez-Viadel, David Arce, Ignacio Blanquer, Carlos Cañete, Maria Escartí, Ana M González-Pinto, Julio Sanjuán. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 25.07.2018. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.