dc.contributor.author | Lliso, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pascual, U. | |
dc.contributor.author | Engel, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mariel Chladkova, Petr ![ORCID](/themes/Mirage2//images/orcid_16x16.png) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-29T08:58:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-29T08:58:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ecological Economics 169 : (2020) // Article ID 106499 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0921-8009 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/47382 | |
dc.description.abstract | The literature on payments for ecosystem services (PES) applied in regions where indigenous peoples are key social actors has not cast much light on their preferences regarding the framing and design features that such economic incentives should have to ensure their effectiveness. Thus, it is key to find appropriate approaches that can be used to elicit the preferences of indigenous peoples regarding PES design. Here we provide new insights regarding the use of deliberative valuation to elicit of the preferences of an indigenous community from Colombia towards the design of a PES program. A deliberative choice experiment is applied that sheds light on why indigenous people's perspectives need to be taken into account if PES are to be effective and fair. We find that participants from the indigenous community value highly equity considerations that go beyond the monetary benefit that PES provide, such as being able to meaningfully participate in the design of PES or deciding the fairest way to distribute payments. © 2019 Elsevier B.V. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation , the Department of Education, Language Policy and Culture of the Basque government (grant number PI2015-1-103 and IT1359-19 [UPV/EHU Econometrics Research Group]), and by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness MINECO through BC3 María de Maeztu excellence accreditation MDM-2017-0714 and through grant ECO2017-82111-R. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/ECO2017-82111- | es_ES |
dc.relation | ES/1PE/ECO2017-82111-R | es_ES |
dc.relation | ES/1PE/MDM-2017-0714 | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | design | es_ES |
dc.subject | ecosystem service | es_ES |
dc.subject | environmental economics | es_ES |
dc.subject | equity | es_ES |
dc.subject | experimental study | es_ES |
dc.subject | indigenous population | es_ES |
dc.subject | local participation | es_ES |
dc.subject | participatory approach | es_ES |
dc.subject | perception | es_ES |
dc.subject | Colombia | es_ES |
dc.title | Payments for ecosystem services or collective stewardship of mother earth? Applying deliberative valuation in an indigenous community in Colombia | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | © 2019 Elsevier B.V. | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España | * |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106499 | es_ES |