Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLenzi, Sara
dc.contributor.authorSádaba Fernández, Juan Antonio
dc.contributor.authorLindborg, PerMagnus
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T12:43:53Z
dc.date.available2021-05-20T12:43:53Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-24
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology 12 : (2021) // Article ID 570741es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/51513
dc.description.abstractThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown meant a greatly reduced social and economic activity. Sound is of major importance to people's perception of the environment, and some remarked that the soundscape was changing for the better. But are these anecdotal reports based in truth? Has traffic noise from cars and airplanes really gone down, so that more birdsong can be heard? Have socially distanced people quietened down? This article presents a case study of the human perception of environmental sounds in an urban neighborhood in the Basque Country between 15 March and 25 May 2020. The social restrictions imposed through national legislation divided the 69-day period into three phases. We collected observations, field audio recordings, photography, and diary notes on 50 days. Experts in soundscape and architecture were presented with the recordings, in randomized order, and made two separate perceptual analyses. One group (N = 11) rated the recordings for pleasantness and eventfulness using an adapted version of the Swedish Soundscape Quality Protocol, and a partly overlapping group (N = 12) annotated perceived sound events with free-form semantic labels. The labels were systematically classified into a four-level Taxonomy of Sound Sources, allowing an estimation of the relative amounts of Natural, Human, and Technological sounds. Loudness and three descriptors developed for bioacoustics were extracted computationally. Analysis showed that Eventfulness, Acoustic Complexity, and Acoustic Richness increased significantly over the time period, while the amount of Technological sounds decreased. These observations were interpreted as reflecting changes in people's outdoor activities and behavior over the whole 69-day period, evidenced in an increased presence of Human sounds of voices and walking, and a significant shift from motorized vehicles toward personal mobility devices, again evidenced by perceived sounds. Quantitative results provided a backdrop against which qualitative analyses of diary notes and observations were interpreted in relation to the restrictions and the architectural specifics of the site. An integrated analysis of all sources pointed at the temporary suspension of human outdoor activity as the main reason for such a change. In the third phase, the progressive return of street life and the usage of personal mobility vehicles seemed to be responsible for a clear increase in Eventfulness and Loudness even in the context of an overall decrease of Technological sounds. Indoor human activity shared through open windows and an increased presence of birdsong emerge as a novel characteristic element of the local urban soundscape. We discuss how such changes in the acoustic environment of the site, in acoustic measurements and as perceived by humans, point toward the soundscape being a crucial component of a comprehensive urban design strategy that aims to improve health and quality of life for increasingly large and dense populations in the future.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was conducted with funding from Politcnico di Milano - Design (Lenzi), EKOPOL (Sábada), and CityU StUp Grant 7200671 (Lindborg).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectCOVID-19es_ES
dc.subjectcase studyes_ES
dc.subjectpandemices_ES
dc.subjectperception and cognitiones_ES
dc.subjectsocial responsees_ES
dc.subjectsoundscapees_ES
dc.subjecturbanismes_ES
dc.titleSoundscape in Times of Change: Case Study of a City Neighbourhood During the COVID-19 Lockdownes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder2021 Lenzi, Sádaba and Lindborg. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.570741/fulles_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2021.570741
dc.departamentoesArquitecturaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuArkitekturaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

2021 Lenzi, Sádaba and Lindborg. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as 2021 Lenzi, Sádaba and Lindborg. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.