Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoñi Balentziaga, Olatz
dc.contributor.authorOrtega Sáez, Iván
dc.contributor.authorVila, Sergi
dc.contributor.authorAzkona Mendoza, Garikoitz ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-11T09:24:28Z
dc.date.available2021-08-11T09:24:28Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-27
dc.identifier.citationLaboratory Animal Research 37 : (2021) // Article ID 18es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2233-7660
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/52823
dc.description.abstract[EN] Background: Replacement, reduction and refinement, the 3R principles, provide a framework to minimize the use and suffering of animals in science. In this context, we aimed to determine the actual perception that individuals working with laboratory rodents in biomedical research have on animal welfare and on their interaction with the animals, as well as how they perceive its impact on their social relations. To this end, we designed an anonymous on-line survey for people working with rodents, at three responsibility levels, in Spain. Results: Of the 356 participants, 239 were women (67 %); 263 were researchers (74%), and 93 animal facility staff (26%), of which 55 were caretakers/technicians (15 %), and 38 welfare officer/veterinarians (11 %). Animal facility staff indicated environmental enrichment to be a universal practice. About half of the participants reported that, in their opinion, animals suffer “little to none” or “minor” stress and pain. Animal caretakers/technicians and researchers perceived higher levels of stress and pain than welfare officers/veterinarians. Participants judged decapitation the most unpleasant method to kill rodents, whereas anaesthetic overdose was the least one. A sizable proportion − 21% of animal caretakers/technicians and 11.4% of researchers - stated that they were never given the choice not to euthanize the rodents they work with. Overall, women reported higher interactions with animals than men. Nevertheless, we could detect a significant correlation between time spent with the animals and interaction scores. Notably, 80% of animal facility staff and 92% of researchers rarely talked about their work with laboratory rodents with people outside their inner social circle. Conclusions: Overall, the participants showed high awareness and sensitivity to rodent wellbeing; animal facility staff reported a similar perception on welfare questions, independently of their category, while researchers, who spent less time with the animals, showed less awareness and manifested lower human-animal interaction and less social support. Regarding the perception on social acceptance of laboratory animal work, all groups were cautious and rarely talked about their job, suggesting that it is considered a sensitive issue in Spain.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research of G.A. is supported by grants from University of Basque Country (UPV/EHU) - Psicobiologia PPGI19/14 and GIU18/103.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectenvironmental enrichmentes_ES
dc.subjectanalgesiaes_ES
dc.subjectanesthesiaes_ES
dc.subjecteuthanasiaes_ES
dc.subjecthuman-animal interactiones_ES
dc.subjectsocial supportes_ES
dc.subjectlaboratory rodentes_ES
dc.titleWorking with laboratory rodents in Spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeinges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://rdcu.be/ctPTIes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s42826-021-00098-w
dc.departamentoesPsicología Clínica y de la Salud y Metodología de Investigaciónes_ES
dc.departamentoesProcesos psicológicos básicos y su desarrolloes_ES
dc.departamentoeuPsikologia Klinikoa eta Osasunaren Psikologia eta Ikerketa Metodologiaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuOinarrizko psikologia prozesuak eta haien garapenaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if
changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons
licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons
licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain
permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the
data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.