Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSegarra Echevarria, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorRecio Barbero, María
dc.contributor.authorSáenz Herrero, Margarita
dc.contributor.authorMentxaka Solozabal, Oihane
dc.contributor.authorCabezas Garduño, Janire
dc.contributor.authorEguiluz Urruchurtu, José Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorCallado Hernando, Luis Felipe ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-22T11:55:37Z
dc.date.available2021-12-22T11:55:37Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 24(9) : 694-702 (2021)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1461-1457
dc.identifier.issn1469-5111
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/54620
dc.description.abstractBackground: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) may be a suitable therapeutic option for those patients in earlier stages of psychosis to avoid relapses and disease progression. Despite that, there is a lack of evidence in the literature regarding the use of LAIs in this profile of patients. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort analysis to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and pattern of use of palmitate paliperidone long-acting injectable (PPLAI) formulations (1- and 3-month doses) compared to oral paliperidone/risperidone in patients with a nonaffective first episode of psychosis (FEP) over 12 months of follow-up. Relevant sociodemographic and clinical information were assessed, as well as main clinical scales: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Personal and Social Performance Scale, and Clinical Global Impression Scale Improvement and Severity measures. Results: The study included 48 patients, 16 per arm, who were aged 20-50 years and had an FEP. Significant improvements were registered for all treatment groups. Despite that, patients receiving PPLAI 1- and 3-month formulations obtained greater improvements than those in the oral group in the main domains assessed (P < .001). We found no statistically significant differences in hospitalizations between groups. Side effects were presented in 24% of patients. A trend towards reducing antipsychotic doses was observed in 43.8% of patients to achieve the minimum effective dose and avoid the occurrence of side effects. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the use of palmitate paliperidone long-acting formulations versus oral risperidone or paliperidone in FEP. Treatment with PPLAI formulations seems to be an effective therapeutic choice at earlier stages of the disease.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford University Presses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectfirst episode psychosises_ES
dc.subjectlong-acting injectable antipsychoticses_ES
dc.subjectpaliperidonees_ES
dc.subjectrecent-onset psychosises_ES
dc.subjectrisperidonees_ES
dc.subjectschizophrenia spectrum disorderses_ES
dc.subjectnonaffective psychosises_ES
dc.subjectfunctional recoveryes_ES
dc.subjectrecent-onsetes_ES
dc.subjectrelapsees_ES
dc.subjectpredictorses_ES
dc.subjectdiscontinuationes_ES
dc.subjectantipsychoticses_ES
dc.subjectmetaanalysises_ES
dc.subjectremissiones_ES
dc.titleOral and Palmitate Paliperidone Long-Acting Injectable Formulations’ Use in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Retrospective Cohort Study from the First Episode Psychosis Intervention Program (CRUPEP)es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly citedes_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://academic.oup.com/ijnp/article/24/9/694/6261963es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ijnp/pyab021
dc.departamentoesFarmacologíaes_ES
dc.departamentoesNeurocienciases_ES
dc.departamentoeuFarmakologiaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuNeurozientziakes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited