Abstract
Development cooperation is in a process of rethinking its objectives, agents and instruments, which must be adapted to address global challenges. In this framework, decentralized development cooperation is more relevant for its contribution in terms of experience and mutual learning than for its quantitative dimension. Cooperation promoted by sub-state entities, with a prominent presence of civil society, can contribute to less conditioned, more horizontal practices. A greater participation of different agents, who could contribute with their experience, can help to promote changes in coooperation processes. However, these potentialities run the risk of not materializing, and remain in good intentions. This study combines data on Official Development Assistance, and its classifications, with qualitative aspects that define decentralized cooperation and its practices, in countries where they have an established track record. A great diversity of practices is found depending on the cases, which could lead to exploring opportunities for instruments or practices from one place to another. The study also reflects the problem of metrics in these practices, which would require new monitoring and information frameworks adapted to them, not so focused on traditional information linked to aid.