Itemaren erregistro erraza erakusten du

dc.contributor.authorBasaguren del Campo, Ana Luisa
dc.contributor.authorLarrañaga Arrizabalaga, Aitor
dc.contributor.authorOtermin, Ainhoa
dc.contributor.authorMolinero, Jon
dc.contributor.authorLarrañaga, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorPozo Martínez, Jesús ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-28T17:26:15Z
dc.date.available2023-03-28T17:26:15Z
dc.date.issued2022-07
dc.identifier.citationHydrobiologia 849(13) : 2983-2997 (2022)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1573-5117
dc.identifier.issn0018-8158
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/60533
dc.description.abstractDetritivores are pivotal in forest streams as they process detritus and promote secondary production. Many studies have addressed the preference of freshwater detritivores towards materials of differing quality. Nevertheless, few studies compare the resource preferences in the laboratory with the availability in the field. In the present study, feeding preferences of two stream detritivores (the caddisfly Sericostoma pyrenaicum and the amphipod Echinogammarus tarragonensis), over three native leaf species (alder, chestnut and oak) and an exotic species (eucalypt) were quantified in the laboratory. Preference for eucalypt leaves conditioned for 1, 2 and 3 weeks was also described. We then contrasted the preference patterns in the laboratory feeding experiments with a 15-month-long benthic standing stock time series of a stream below a native deciduous forest and another below a eucalypt plantation. Both detritivores preferred consuming alder leaves and more conditioned eucalypt leaves, although the amphipod was more selective than the caddisfly. The consumption preference in the laboratory was unmatched by the availability in the field, especially under eucalypt plantations and for the amphipod. Our results show that the strength of the preference for high-quality resources can differ among different taxa, which can modulate their response to land use changes.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This study was funded by the Spanish Dirección General de Enseñanza Superior e Investigación Científica (Project DGESIC PB98-0151) and finanacial support in terms of a predoctoral Grant to A. Otermin from Basque Government.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectleaf litter qualityes_ES
dc.subjectinvertebrate detritivoreses_ES
dc.subjectresource selectiones_ES
dc.subjectconsumption rateses_ES
dc.subjectmicrocosmses_ES
dc.titleResource preference of two stream detritivores in the laboratory largely differs from the supply of detritus below eucalypt plantationses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10750-022-04908-7es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10750-022-04908-7
dc.departamentoesBiología vegetal y ecologíaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuLandaren biologia eta ekologiaes_ES


Item honetako fitxategiak

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Item hau honako bilduma honetan/hauetan agertzen da

Itemaren erregistro erraza erakusten du

© The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Bestelakorik adierazi ezean, itemaren baimena horrela deskribatzen da:© The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.