Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPerez Castrillón, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorDueñas Laita, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorGómez Alonso, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorJódar, Esteban
dc.contributor.authorDel Pino Montes, Javier
dc.contributor.authorBrandi, María Luisa
dc.contributor.authorCereto Castro, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorQuesada Gómez, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorGallego López, Laura
dc.contributor.authorOlmos Martínez, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorAlhambra Expósito, María Rosa
dc.contributor.authorGalarraga Gallastegui, Bernat
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Macías, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorNeyro, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorBouillon, Roger
dc.contributor.authorHernández Herrero, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorFernández Hernando, Nieves
dc.contributor.authorChinchilla, Sandra
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-09T14:42:31Z
dc.date.available2023-05-09T14:42:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Bone and Mineral Research 38(4) : 471-479 (2023)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0884-0431
dc.identifier.issn1523-4681
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/61056
dc.description.abstractVitamin D plays a major role in bone health and probably also in multiple extraskeletal acute and chronic diseases. Although supplementation with calcifediol, a vitamin D metabolite, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in short-term clinical trials, its effects after long-term monthly administration have been studied less extensively. This report describes the results of a 1-year, phase III-IV, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel, multicenter superiority clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of monthly calcifediol 0.266 mg versus cholecalciferol 25,000 IU (0.625 mg) in postmenopausal women with vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL). A total of 303 women were randomized and 298 evaluated. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to calcifediol 0.266 mg/month for 12 months (Group A1), calcifediol 0.266 mg/month for 4 months followed by placebo for 8 months (Group A2), and cholecalciferol 25,000 IU/month (0.625 mg/month) for 12 months (Group B). By month 4, stable 25(OH)D levels were documented with both calcifediol and cholecalciferol (intention-to-treat population): 26.8 ± 8.5 ng/mL (Group A1) and 23.1 ± 5.4 ng/mL (Group B). By month 12, 25(OH)D levels were 23.9 ± 8.0 ng/mL (Group A1) and 22.4 ± 5.5 ng/mL (Group B). When calcifediol treatment was withdrawn in Group A2, 25(OH)D levels decreased to baseline levels (28.5 ± 8.7 ng/mL at month 4 versus 14.4 ± 6.0 ng/mL at month 12). No relevant treatment-related safety issues were reported in any of the groups. The results confirm that long-term treatment with monthly calcifediol in vitamin D-deficient patients is effective and safe. The withdrawal of treatment leads to a pronounced decrease of 25(OH)D levels. Calcifediol presented a faster onset of action compared to monthly cholecalciferol. Long-term treatment produces stable and sustained 25(OH)D concentrations with no associated safety concerns.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by Faes Farma, S.A. and Bruno Farmaceutici S.p.A. The authors wish to thank the study participants, research staff, the secondary investigators of the Osteoferol study group, the home nursing staff (Emibet), and Faes Farma clinical research team: Paula Arranz Gutiérrez, Lorena Elgezabal González, Mariana Frau Usoz, and Iñigo Saez Riesco. Medical writing support was provided by Francisco López de Saro (Trialance SCCL), funded by Faes Farma, S.A.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectcalcifedioles_ES
dc.subjectcholecalciferoles_ES
dc.subjectvitamin D deficiencyes_ES
dc.subjectmenopausees_ES
dc.titleLong-Term Treatment and Effect of Discontinuation of Calcifediol in Postmenopausal Women with Vitamin D Deficiency: A Randomized Triales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2023 Faes Farma SA.Journal of Bone and Mineral Researchpublished by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research(ASBMR). This is an open access article under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivsLicense, which permits use and distribution inany medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are madees_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://asbmr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbmr.4776es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jbmr.4776
dc.departamentoesMedicinaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuMedikuntzaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 Faes Farma SA.Journal of Bone and Mineral Researchpublished by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research(ASBMR). This is an open access article under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivsLicense, which permits use and distribution inany medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 Faes Farma SA.Journal of Bone and Mineral Researchpublished by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research(ASBMR). This is an open access article under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivsLicense, which permits use and distribution inany medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made