Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMelo, J.
dc.contributor.authorBaker, T.
dc.contributor.authorNemitz, D.
dc.contributor.authorQuegan, S.
dc.contributor.authorZiv, G.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-14T11:35:07Z
dc.date.available2023-06-14T11:35:07Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Research Letters: 18 (3): 34021 (2023)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/61378
dc.description.abstractThe Earth observation (EO) community is coordinating a range of activities in support of the Global Stocktake. One objective is to enhance the uptake of satellite-based global-scale maps (hereafter ‘EO products’) in national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). To measure progress towards this objective, we compile information on the use of EO products on land cover, fire, and above-ground biomass to derive carbon flux estimates in forest reference levels from 56 tropical countries submitted to the UNFCCC between 2014-2022. The global forest change (GFC) was the only EO product used to measure land extent and change, and was used by almost half the countries. Only two countries used existing EO products for fire mapping. Four countries used biomass maps, although only indirectly, such as for comparing with biomass estimates from field plot measurements or with IPCC defaults. The uptake is limited but improved the measurement, reporting and verification capacity of 22 countries. The relatively high uptake of the GFC demonstrates the importance of meeting essential conditions in the IPCC guidance when developing EO products, including conditions on spatial and temporal resolution, temporal coverage and consistency, and the flexibility to adapt to biophysical thresholds in national definitions. The limited use of other global land EO products underlines the need for developers of EO products to interact with groups responsible for GHG inventories and experts familiar with IPCC guidance so that their products are suitable for national reporting, and thus contribute to more complete aggregated estimates in the Global Stocktake. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipJM was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC Reference NE/L002574/1) until 31 October 2022. JM acknowledges the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) task teams working on contributions from the AFOLU sector to the Global Stocktake and the Biomass Harmonization sub-group for the exchange of views and feedback provided. The authors thank Marieke Sandker for her contribution to the quality control of the attribution of AD method used in the submissions flagged as low confidence in our study. The authors acknowledge the constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherEnvironmental Research Letterses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectearth observationes_ES
dc.subjectglobal stocktakees_ES
dc.subjectLULUCFes_ES
dc.subjectREDD+es_ES
dc.subjectresearch &ampes_ES
dc.subjectsystematic observationes_ES
dc.subjecttropical forestses_ES
dc.titleSatellite-based global maps are rarely used in forest reference levels submitted to the UNFCCCes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltdes_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acba31es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1748-9326/acba31


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd