Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMathys, A.S.
dc.contributor.authorvan Vianen, J.
dc.contributor.authorRowland, D.
dc.contributor.authorNarulita, S.
dc.contributor.authorPalomo, I.
dc.contributor.authorPascual, U.
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, I.J.
dc.contributor.authorAhammad, R.
dc.contributor.authorSunderland, T.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T08:35:22Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T08:35:22Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationEcosystems and People: 19 (1): 2174685 (2023)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/61426
dc.description.abstractAgrarian change affects the supply and demand of ecosystem services (ES) by reducing the extent of natural ecosystems. Agricultural intensification can lead to changes in land covers and livelihood opportunities and it remains unclear how such changes align or misalign with the desires of local communities. Using participatry mapping, we assessed ES uses and desires of Indigenous people and local communities provided by different land cover types along a gradient of agricultural intensification (forest subsistence, agroforestry mosaic, and monoculture and market-dependence) in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. We found that mapped ES use diversity was highest in the forest-dependent zone and lowest near monoculture agricultural systems. The expressed ES uses and desires varied greatly among land cover types amidst loss of old-growth forest and greater reliance on secondary forest and shrub land. The spatial analysis showed that high priority areas of ES use was related to access in the landscape, demonstrating the importance of attending to place-based social values in ES assessments. From this study, we call for a people-centric spatial modelling approach to address the divergence of social and cultural ES values associated with land covers under different intensification contexts. Participatory mapping clarifies the ES desires of local communities, which state policy often fails to address. We recommend a place specific management strategy to reduce ES trade-offs of specific land use practices, which are currently apparent with agrarian change in Indonesia and relevant for other tropical developing countries.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipfor this project has been provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) KnowFor through grants to CIFOR. This publication is an output of the CGIAR Consortium Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry. We are grateful to the reviewers for providing constructive comments on the earlier draft of the manuscript. The authors thank the villagers and other national stakeholders who participated in our study.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherEcosystems and Peoplees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectAgrarian changees_ES
dc.subjectland use changees_ES
dc.subjectland use planninges_ES
dc.subjectmultifunctional landscapeses_ES
dc.subjectsynergies and trade-offses_ES
dc.subjectValia Drakoues_ES
dc.subjectvaluation of ecosystem serviceses_ES
dc.titleParticipatory mapping of ecosystem services across a gradient of agricultural intensification in West Kalimantan, Indonesiaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Author(s).es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2023.2174685es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/26395916.2023.2174685


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Author(s).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Author(s).