Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChaplin-Kramer, R.
dc.contributor.authorNeugarten, R.A.
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Jimenez, D.
dc.contributor.authorAhmadia, G.
dc.contributor.authorBaird, T.D.
dc.contributor.authorCrane, N.
dc.contributor.authorDelgoulet, E.
dc.contributor.authorEyster, H.N.
dc.contributor.authorKurashima, N.
dc.contributor.authorLlopis, J.C.
dc.contributor.authorMillington, A.
dc.contributor.authorPawlowska-Mainville, A.
dc.contributor.authorRulmal, J.
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, F.
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, S.
dc.contributor.authorVaughan, M.B
dc.contributor.authorWinter, K.B.
dc.contributor.authorWongbusarakum, S.
dc.contributor.authorPascual, U.
dc.date2024-10-01
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T10:56:02Z
dc.date.available2023-10-06T10:56:02Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability: 64: 101347 (2023)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/62749
dc.description.abstractAs countries consider new area-based conservation targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity, protected areas (PAs) and their impacts on people and nature are coming under increasing scrutiny. We review the evidence base on PA impacts, combining the findings from existing rigorous impact evaluations with local case studies developed for this study. We identify characteristics of PA establishment and management that improve the sustainability of biodiversity conservation and justice for local communities. We find that recognizing and respecting local values and knowledge about natural resource stewardship, colearning, and comanagement are key to achieving positive impacts for nature and people. Transforming PA governance toward more inclusive conservation depends upon the ability of PAs to be designed and implemented around the values and needs of local people. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank Mariana Cantu Fernandez, Haku Bo, Adriana Castillo, Cortni Borgerson, Aristide Andrianarimisa, J. Terrence McCabe, Emily Woodhouse, and Hannah Kihalani Springer for their contribution to the literature review and case studies, and especially Elise Delgoulet for her assistance assembling the impacts evaluation database. RCK was supported by the Natural Capital Project, (USA). RAN was supported by the US National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship 2019067768 (USA). TDB was funded by the US National Science Foundation (BCS-1660428) (USA). HNE was supported by a University of British Columbia International Doctoral Fellowship (Canada) and a Gund Postdoctoral Fellowship (USA). JCL was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant no. P500PN_206846 (Switzerland). SS was funded by Gordon and Betty Moore (USA). UP was funded by the Maria de Maeztu excellence accreditation 2023–2026 (Ref. CEX2021-001201-M) (Spain).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainabilityes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MCIN/CEX2021-001201-Mes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.titleTransformation for inclusive conservation: evidence on values, decisions, and impacts in protected areases_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/reviewes_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2023 Elsevier B.V.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101347es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101347


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 Elsevier B.V.