Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDürig, Wiebke
dc.contributor.authorLindblad, Sofia
dc.contributor.authorGolovko, Oksana
dc.contributor.authorGkotsis, Georgios
dc.contributor.authorAalizadeh, Reza
dc.contributor.authorNika, Maria-Cristina
dc.contributor.authorThomaidis, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorAlygizakis, Nikiforos A.
dc.contributor.authorPlassmann, Merle
dc.contributor.authorHaglund, Peter
dc.contributor.authorFu, Qiuguo
dc.contributor.authorHollender, Juliane
dc.contributor.authorChaker, Jade
dc.contributor.authorDavid, Arthur
dc.contributor.authorKunkel, Uwe
dc.contributor.authorMacherius, André
dc.contributor.authorBelova, Lidia
dc.contributor.authorPoma, Giulia
dc.contributor.authorPreud'Homme, Hugues
dc.contributor.authorMunschy, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorAminot, Yann
dc.contributor.authorJaeger, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorLisec, Jan
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Martin
dc.contributor.authorVorkamp, Katrin
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Linyan
dc.contributor.authorCapelli, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorRoscioli, Caludio
dc.contributor.authorValsecchi, Sara
dc.contributor.authorBaagnati, Renzo
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Gaya, Belén
dc.contributor.authorPrieto Sobrino, Ailette
dc.contributor.authorZuloaga Zubieta, Olatz
dc.contributor.authorGil Solsona, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorGago Ferrero, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Mozaz, Sara
dc.contributor.authorBudzinski, Hélène
dc.contributor.authorDevier, Marie-Helene
dc.contributor.authorDierkers, Georg
dc.contributor.authorBoulard, Lise
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Griet
dc.contributor.authorVoorspoels, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorRüdel, Heinz
dc.contributor.authorAhrens, Lutz
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-16T14:53:29Z
dc.date.available2024-04-16T14:53:29Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-25
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental International 181 : (2023) // Article ID108288es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0160-4120
dc.identifier.issn1873-6750
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/66706
dc.description.abstractA collaborative trial involving 16 participants from nine European countries was conducted within the NORMAN network in efforts to harmonise suspect and non-target screening of environmental contaminants in whole fish samples of bream (Abramis brama). Participants were provided with freeze-dried, homogenised fish samples from a contaminated and a reference site, extracts (spiked and non-spiked) and reference sample preparation protocols for liquid chromatography (LC) and gas chromatography (GC) coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). Participants extracted fish samples using their in-house sample preparation method and/or the protocol provided. Participants correctly identified 9–69 % of spiked compounds using LC-HRMS and 20–60 % of spiked compounds using GC-HRMS. From the contaminated site, suspect screening with participants’ own suspect lists led to putative identification of on average ~145 and ~20 unique features per participant using LC-HRMS and GC-HRMS, respectively, while non-target screening identified on average ~42 and ~56 unique features per participant using LC-HRMS and GC-HRMS, respectively. Within the same sub-group of sample preparation method, only a few features were identified by at least two participants in suspect screening (16 features using LC-HRMS, 0 features using GC-HRMS) and non-target screening (0 features using LC-HRMS, 2 features using GC-HRMS). The compounds identified had log octanol/water partition coefficient (KOW) values from − 9.9 to 16 and mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) of 68 to 761 (LC-HRMS and GC-HRMS). A significant linear trend was found between log KOW and m/z for the GC-HRMS data. Overall, these findings indicate that differences in screening results are mainly due to the data analysis workflows used by different participants. Further work is needed to harmonise the results obtained when applying suspect and non-target screening approaches to environmental biota samples.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the NORMAN network.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectsuspect and non-target analysises_ES
dc.subjectbiotaes_ES
dc.subjectLC-HRMSes_ES
dc.subjectGC-HRMSes_ES
dc.subjectcollaborative triales_ES
dc.subjectexposomees_ES
dc.titleWhat is in the fish? Collaborative trial in suspect and non-target screening of organic micropollutants using LC- and GC-HRMSes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY licensees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412023005615es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envint.2023.108288
dc.departamentoesQuímica analíticaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuKimika analitikoaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license