Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMusatadi Larrucea, Mikel
dc.contributor.authorBaciero Hernández, Inés
dc.contributor.authorPrieto Sobrino, Ailette
dc.contributor.authorOlivares Zabalandikoetxea, Maitane
dc.contributor.authorEtxebarria Loizate, Nestor
dc.contributor.authorZuloaga Zubieta, Olatz
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-16T15:06:29Z
dc.date.available2024-04-16T15:06:29Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-13
dc.identifier.citationChemosphere 351 : (2024) // Article ID 141221es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535
dc.identifier.issn1879-1298
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/66708
dc.description.abstractSuspect and non-target screening (SNTS) methods are being promoted in order to decode the human exposome since a wide chemical space can be analysed in a diversity of human biofluids. However, SNTS approaches in the exposomics field are infra-studied in comparison to environmental or food monitoring studies. In this work, a comprehensive suspect screening workflow was developed to annotate exposome-related xenobiotics and phase II metabolites in diverse human biofluids. Precisely, human urine, breast milk, saliva and ovarian follicular fluid were employed as samples and analysed by means of ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS/MS). To automate the workflow, the “peak rating” parameter implemented in Compound Discoverer 3.3.2 was optimized to avoid time-consuming manual revision of chromatographic peaks. In addition, the presence of endogenous molecules that might interfere with the annotation of xenobiotics was carefully studied as the employment of inclusion and exclusion suspect lists. To evaluate the workflow, limits of identification (LOIs) and type I and II errors (i.e., false positives and negatives, respectively) were calculated in both standard solutions and spiked biofluids using 161 xenobiotics and 22 metabolites. For 80.3 % of the suspects, LOIs below 15 ng/mL were achieved. In terms of type I errors, only two cases were identified in standards and spiked samples. Regarding type II errors, the 7.7 % errors accounted in standards increased to 17.4 % in real samples. Lastly, the use of an inclusion list for endogens was favoured since it avoided 18.7 % of potential type I errors, while the exclusion list caused 7.2 % of type II errors despite making the annotation workflow less time-consuming.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipAuthors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the State Research Agency of the Ministry of Science and Innovation (Government of Spain) through project PID 2020-117686RB-C31 and the Basque Government as a consolidated group of the Basque Research System (IT-1446-22). Mikel Musatadi and Inés Baciero-Hernández also acknowledge the Basque Government for their predoctoral fellowships.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MCIN/PID 2020-117686RB-C31es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectsuspect and non-target screeninges_ES
dc.subjecthuman biofluidses_ES
dc.subjectpeak ratinges_ES
dc.subjectendogenous moleculeses_ES
dc.subjectinclusion and exclusion suspect listses_ES
dc.subjecttype I and II errorses_ES
dc.titleDevelopment and evaluation of a comprehensive workflow for suspect screening of exposome-related xenobiotics and phase II metabolites in diverse human biofluidses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC licensees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653524001140es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141221
dc.departamentoesQuímica analíticaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuKimika analitikoaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license