Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEscajedo San Epifanio, Leire
dc.contributor.authorFilibi López, Igor ORCID
dc.contributor.authorLasa López, Ainhoa ORCID
dc.contributor.authorPuigdomènech, Pere
dc.contributor.authorUncetabarrenechea Larrabe, Javier ORCID
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-08T14:15:51Z
dc.date.available2024-05-08T14:15:51Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Plant Science 14 : (2023) // Article ID 1141455es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1664-462X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/67725
dc.description.abstractThis article addresses the scenarios that may be encountered by the first application for pre-market approval of a CRISPR-edited plant in the EU. Two alternative scenarios are considered in the short and medium term. One of these possible EU futures depends on the final drafting and approval of EU legislation on certain New Genomic Techniques, which was started in 2021 and is due to be quite advanced before the next European Parliament elections in 2024. Since the proposed legislation excludes plants with foreign DNA, two different approval processes for CRISPR-edited plants will coexist if the legislation enters into force: one for plants whose genome has been altered, resulting in mutagenesis, cisgenesis and intragenesis; and the second for plants whose alterations result in transgenesis in general. In the event that this legislative process does not succeed, CRISPR-edited plants in the EU could face a regulatory scenario whose foundations were laid in the 1990s: the regulatory framework that applies to GM crops, food and feed. In this review, an ad hoc analytical framework has been built that considers in depth the two possible futures for CRISPR-edited plants in the EU. This framework emphasises the way in which the European Union and the Member States (MS), with their respective national interests, have historically shaped the regulatory framework for plant breeding in the EU. On the basis of the analyses carried out on the two possible futures for CRISPR-edited plants and of their potential with respect to plant breeding, the main conclusions are the following. Firstly, that the regulatory review that started in 2021 is not in itself “good enough” for plant breeding and CRISPR-edited plants. Secondly, that compared to its alternative, the regulatory review currently underway contains at least some promising improvements in the short term. Hence, thirdly, in addition to adopting the current regulation, the MS need to continue to work towards a substantial improvement in the legal status of plant breeding in the EU in the medium term.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, VegEquity Project – Plant Breeding and European Integration (PID2021-123796OB-C21 DER), PR. LE; and Basque Government Grant for Research Groups of the Basque University System, IT1733-22 Multilevel Governance and EU Law (2022-2025).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN/PID2021-123796OB-C21 DERes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectEuropean integrationes_ES
dc.subjectEU regulatory framework for plant breedinges_ES
dc.subjectEU legislation on new genomic techniqueses_ES
dc.subjectpremarket approval of CRISPR-edited plantses_ES
dc.subjectEU status of CRISPR-edited plantses_ES
dc.titlePossible EU futures for CRISPR-edited plants: Little margin for optimism?es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2023 Escajedo San-Epifanio, Filibi, Lasa López, Puigdomènech and Uncetabarrenechea Larrabe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1141455/fulles_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpls.2023.1141455
dc.departamentoesDerecho Público y Ciencias Histórico-Jurídicas y del Pensamiento Políticoes_ES
dc.departamentoeuZuzenbide Publikoa eta Zientzia Historiko-juridikoak eta Pentsamendu Politikoarenakes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 Escajedo San-Epifanio, Filibi, Lasa López, Puigdomènech and Uncetabarrenechea Larrabe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 Escajedo San-Epifanio, Filibi, Lasa López, Puigdomènech and Uncetabarrenechea Larrabe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.