Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIdoiaga Mondragón, Nahia ORCID
dc.contributor.authorYarritu Corrales, Ion ORCID
dc.contributor.authorSáez de Cámara Oleaga, Estibaliz ORCID
dc.contributor.authorBeloki Arizti, Miren Nekane ORCID
dc.contributor.authorVozmediano Sanz, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-23T17:06:46Z
dc.date.available2024-05-23T17:06:46Z
dc.date.issued2023-07
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology 14 : (2023) // Article ID 1158636es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/68131
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: One of the major challenges for higher education institutions in the last decade has been (and will continue to be) the integration of sustainability into their curricula and the development of sustainability competences in students. Education for Sustainability (ES) can help prepare students to meet the challenges of making societies more sustainable. However, as a first step toward this goal, teachers need to incorporate ES into their teaching. In this regard, this research aimed to analyze if members of the teaching staff have started this integration and, if so, which sustainability-related topics have been introduced and which skills do they consider contribute to the development of future graduates. Methods: A questionnaire was administered to teaching staff at the University of the Basque Country in 2022. A total of 403 teachers completed the questionnaire, expressing their perceptions through open-ended questions. Results: In general terms teachers incorporate ES into their teaching (71.22%). However, they do this mainly within the framework of two general themes: “Environmental awareness and energy” – most used by teachers of experimental sciences and engineering – and “Social commitment,” most used by teachers of social sciences and those who are familiar with the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Regarding the key competences that ES provides for future graduates, those most frequently mentioned were “training of professionals committed to society” and “critical thinking and ethics.” These competences were particularly notable in the discourse of teachers who were aware of the 2030 Agenda and who use active methodologies in their classrooms. Finally, the opinion that sustainability has little to do with their teaching (28.78%) was notably expressed by teachers less familiar with the 2030 Agenda. Discussion: Thus, it can be concluded that, aside from knowledge of the 2030 Agenda, factors such as the sustainability policy of the institution, area of teaching expertise, and the use of active methodologies all play a significant role in determining whether competences for sustainable development are integrated into higher education teaching.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjecthigher educationes_ES
dc.subjectsustainabilityes_ES
dc.subjectcompetenceses_ES
dc.subjectuniversity teacherses_ES
dc.subjecteducation for sustainabilityes_ES
dc.subjectSDGes_ES
dc.titleThe challenge of education for sustainability in higher education: key themes and competences within the University of the Basque Countryes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2023 Idoiaga Mondragon, Yarritu, Saez de Cámara, Beloki and Vozmediano. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158636/fulles_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158636
dc.departamentoesPsicología Sociales_ES
dc.departamentoesIngeniería química y del medio ambientees_ES
dc.departamentoesPsicología evolutiva y de la educaciónes_ES
dc.departamentoesSociología y trabajo sociales_ES
dc.departamentoeuGizarte Psikologiaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuBilakaeraren eta hezkuntzaren psikologiaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuIngeniaritza kimikoa eta ingurumenaren ingeniaritzaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuSoziologia eta gizarte langintzaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 Idoiaga Mondragon, Yarritu, Saez de Cámara, Beloki and Vozmediano. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 Idoiaga Mondragon, Yarritu, Saez de Cámara, Beloki and Vozmediano. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.