Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEraña Pérez, Zuriñe
dc.contributor.authorIgartua Olaechea, Manuela
dc.contributor.authorSantos Vizcaíno, Edorta
dc.contributor.authorHernández Martín, Rosa María
dc.date2026-02-03
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-25T18:31:59Z
dc.date.available2025-02-25T18:31:59Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-03
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Controlled Release 379 : 951-966 (2025)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0168-3659
dc.identifier.issn1873-4995
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/72900
dc.description.abstractExtracellular vesicles (EV) represent an advanced platform for genetic material and protein delivery, particularly when they are loaded through the so-called endogenous loading method. This study investigates the differences between large EV (lEV) and small EV (sEV) obtained from genetically engineered C2C12 myoblasts overexpressing two different model biomolecules. Erythropoietin (EPO) is a secretory protein with anti-inflammatory, angiogenic and hematopoietic effects, while TGL is a chimeric cytosolic protein containing green fluorescent protein (GFP) and luciferase, used for imaging. We compared these EV subtypes in terms of protein and nucleic acid loading, intercellular cargo transfer capacity, and subsequent functional effects both in vitro and in vivo. Our results demonstrated that lEV exhibited higher protein and mRNA cargo content than sEV, which also translated into increased intercellular cargo transfer capacity, even when dosing according to the constitutive sEV and lEV secretion ratio (10:1). Indeed, we showed that, although receptor cells successfully internalized both EV subtypes, cells treated with lEV displayed stronger intracellular luciferase signals and higher EPO protein secretion compared to those treated with sEV. In terms of functional effects, both EV subtypes exerted anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects in lipopolysaccharide-activated macrophages, as well as angiogenic effects in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Finally, in vivo studies evidenced that subcutaneously administered lEV led to a more significant increase in hematocrit levels and red blood cell counts than sEV. Taken together, these findings suggest that the protein and mRNA cargo differ between endogenously loaded EV subtypes, and that this variation in cargo loading leads to differences in their functional outcomes. Therefore, the choice of EV subtype could be critical for optimizing EV-based delivery strategies for biologic drugs.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project has been supported in part by the Basque Government (Consolidated Groups, IT1448–22).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectextracellular vesicleses_ES
dc.subjectdrug deliveryes_ES
dc.subjectgenetic engineeringes_ES
dc.subjectbiologic-based therapeuticses_ES
dc.titleDifferential protein and mRNA cargo loading into engineered large and small extracellular vesicles reveals differences in in vitro and in vivo assayses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2025 Elsevier under CC BY-NC-ND licensees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.01.085es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.01.085
dc.departamentoesFarmacia y ciencias de los alimentoses_ES
dc.departamentoeuFarmazia eta elikagaien zientziakes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2025 Elsevier under CC BY-NC-ND license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2025 Elsevier under CC BY-NC-ND license