Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLampinen, Jussi
dc.contributor.authorTuomi, Maria
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Leonie K.
dc.contributor.authorNeuenkamp, Lena
dc.contributor.authorAlday, Josu G.
dc.contributor.authorBucharova, Anna
dc.contributor.authorCancellieri, Laura
dc.contributor.authorCasado Arzuaga, Izaskun
dc.contributor.authorCeplova, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorCerveró, Lluïsa
dc.contributor.authorDeak, Balazs
dc.contributor.authorEriksson, Ove
dc.contributor.authorFellowes, Mark D. E.
dc.contributor.authorFernández de Manuel, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorFilibeck, Goffredo
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Guzmán, Adrián
dc.contributor.authorHinojosa, M. Belén
dc.contributor.authorKowarik, Ingo
dc.contributor.authorLumbierres, Belén
dc.contributor.authorMiguel, Ana
dc.contributor.authorPardo, Rosa
dc.contributor.authorPons, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez García, Encarna
dc.contributor.authorSchröder, Roland
dc.contributor.authorSperandii, Marta Gaia
dc.contributor.authorUnterweger, Philipp
dc.contributor.authorValkó, Orsolya
dc.contributor.authorVázquez, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorKlaus, Valentin H.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-13T08:11:36Z
dc.date.available2021-04-13T08:11:36Z
dc.date.issued2021-02
dc.identifier.citationBasic And Applied Ecology 50 : 119-131 (2021)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1439-1791
dc.identifier.issn1618-0089
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/50894
dc.description.abstractGrasslands are widespread elements of urban greenspace providing recreational, psychological and aesthetic benefits to city residents. Two urban grassland types of contrasting management dominate urban greenspaces: frequently mown, species-poor short-cut lawns and less intensively managed, near-natural tall-grass meadows. The higher conservation value of tall-grass meadows makes management interventions such as converting short-cut lawns into tall-grass meadows a promising tool for urban biodiversity conservation. The societal success of such interventions, however, depends on identifying the values urban residents assign to different types of urban grasslands, and how these values translate to attitudes towards greenspace management. Using 2027 questionnaires across 19 European cities, we identify the assigned values that correlate with people's personal greenspace use and their preferences for different types of urban grasslands to determine how these values relate to the agreement with a scenario of converting 50% of their cities' short-cut lawns into tall-grass meadows. We found that most people assigned nature-related values, such as wildness, to tall-grass meadows and utility-related values, such as recreation, to short-cut lawns. Positive value associations of wildness and species richness with tall-grass meadows, and social and nature related greenspace activities, positively correlated with agreeing to convert short-cut lawns into tall-grass meadows. Conversely, disapproval of lawn conversion correlated with positive value associations of cleanliness and recreation potential with short-cut lawns. Here, people using greenspaces for nature-related activities were outstandingly positive about lawn conversion. The results show that the plurality of values assigned to different types of urban grasslands should be considered in urban greenspace planning. For example, tall-grass meadows could be managed to also accommodate the values associated with short-cut lawns, such as tidiness and recreation potential, to support their societal acceptance.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work was supported by the InstitutMunicipal de Parcs i Jardins of the Barcelona city Council, the European Union FP7 collaborative project Green Surge (Leonie K Fischer; FP7ENV.2013.6.2-5-603567, Grant Agreement No. 603567), the Kone Foundation, Ramon y Cajal (RYC-2016-20528), and the grants NKFI KH 133038 & KKP 133839 and NKFI FK 124404es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/603567es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN/RYC-2016-20528es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjecturban biodiversity conservationes_ES
dc.subjectlawn managementes_ES
dc.subjectnature-related valueses_ES
dc.subjecturban grasslandses_ES
dc.subjectecological restorationes_ES
dc.subjectsocio-eco-logical systemses_ES
dc.subjectgreen infrastructurees_ES
dc.subjecturban greenspacees_ES
dc.titleAcceptance of Near-Natural Greenspace Management Relates to Ecological and Socio-Cultural Assigned Values Among European Urbaniteses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holderThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www-sciencedirect-com.ehu.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S1439179120301146es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.baae.2020.10.006
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission
dc.departamentoesBiología vegetal y ecologíaes_ES
dc.departamentoeuLandaren biologia eta ekologiaes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.