Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZafra-Calvo, Z.
dc.contributor.authorGeldmann, J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-18T08:23:12Z
dc.date.available2021-05-18T08:23:12Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationGlobal Ecology and Conservation: 22: e01026 (2020)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn23519894
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/51463
dc.description.abstractIt is widely recognized in science, policy, and practice that protected areas (PAs) that are equitably and effectively managed are essential for halting biodiversity loss. However, our understanding of the relationships between management effectiveness and equity remains weak. Here, we investigate potential synergies and trade-offs between management and equity as well as how they can work together to reduce human pressure in PAs. We then examine the potential of existing global datasets on effectiveness, equity, and human pressure to help inform international policy processes. Our preliminary findings show a negative association between well-defined and sound managed PAs and how satisfied are local people about the decisions related to the management of the PA, reinforcing study of cases that found conflicts in top-down established and managed PAs. We find, however, no association between management effectiveness and social equity with an increasing human pressure. We find only a limited overlap in global databases on management effectiveness, social equity, and human pressure (n = 33). Thus, our results highlight the need to increase the number of PAs with appropriate data about management effectiveness, equity and human pressure to inform policy processes. Without such data, it will be difficult to suggest in honest new quantitative targets for the quality of PAs and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures post-2020.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe would like to thank Mike Mascia and Neil Burgess for useful discussions in early stages of the manuscript. This work is funded by the European Union Horizon 2020 program under the MSCA grant agreement no. 659881 to NZ-C and no. 676108 to JG; as well as VILLUM FONDEN ( VKR023371 ) to JG.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherGlobal Ecology and Conservationes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/67610es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/659881es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectDecision makinges_ES
dc.subjectHuman footprintes_ES
dc.subjectIndicators post-2020es_ES
dc.subjectProtected area design and planninges_ES
dc.subjectQuality protected areases_ES
dc.titleProtected areas to deliver biodiversity need management effectiveness and equityes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.es_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01026es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01026
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission
dc.contributor.funderMSCA
dc.contributor.funderVILLUM FONDEN


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.