Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
The role of land use and land cover change in climate change vulnerability assessments of biodiversity: a systematic review
dc.contributor.author | Santos, M. J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, A. B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dekker, S. C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Eppinga, M. B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Leitão, P. J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Moreno-Mateo, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Morueta-Holme, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ruggeri, M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-16T09:00:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-16T09:00:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Landscape Ecology: 36 (12): 3367-3382-3382 (2021) | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/62206 | |
dc.description.abstract | For many organisms, responses to climate change (CC) will be affected by land-use and land-cover changes (LULCC). However, the extent to which LULCC is concurrently considered in climate change vulnerability assessments (CCVAs) is unclear. Objectives: We identify trends in inclusion of LULCC and CC in vulnerability assessments of species and the direction and magnitude of their combined effect on biodiversity. Further, we examine the effect size of LULCC and CC in driving changes in currencies of response to CC, such as distribution, abundance and survival. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review of articles published in the last 30 years that focused on CCVA and accounted for impacts of both CC and LULCC. Results: Across 116 studies, 34% assumed CC and LULCC would act additively, while 66% allowed for interactive effects. The majority of CCVAs reported similar effect sizes for CC and LULCC, although they affected different CCVA currencies. Only 14% of the studies showed larger effects of CC than of LULCC. Another 14% showed larger effects of LULCC than CC, specifically for dispersal, population viability, and reproduction, which tend to be strongly affected by fragmentation and disturbance. Although most studies found that LULCC and CC had negative effects on species currencies, in some cases effects were neutral or even positive. Conclusions: CCVAs that incorporate LULCC provided a better account of drivers of vulnerability, and highlight aspects of drivers that are generally more amenable to on-the-ground management intervention than CCVAs that focus on CC alone. © 2021, The Author(s). | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | MJS was funded by the University Research Priority Program in Global Change and Biodiversity and the Department of Geography at the University of Zurich. ABS was supported by the Alan Graham Fund in Global Change. PJL was funded by the 2015-2016 BiodivERsA COFUND, with the national funder German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; project GreenFutureForest, Grant 01LC1610A). NMH was supported by the Carlsberg Foundation and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 746334, and acknowledges support from the Danish National Research Foundation for support to the Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate (Grant no. DNRF96). DMM was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through Societal Challenge Program (Grant CGL2015-70452-R) and María de Maeztu excellence accreditation MDM-2017-0714. We would like to thank Dr. Dovi Kacev for the design of the icons used in the paper. This is a contribution on behalf of the IUCN’s Climate Change Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Landscape Ecology | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/746334 | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | Climate change vulnerability assessment | es_ES |
dc.subject | Currencies | es_ES |
dc.subject | Impact and effect | es_ES |
dc.subject | Methodologies | es_ES |
dc.subject | Species | es_ES |
dc.title | The role of land use and land cover change in climate change vulnerability assessments of biodiversity: a systematic review | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | © 2021, The Author(s). | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España | * |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01276-w | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10980-021-01276-w | |
dc.contributor.funder | Societal Challenge Program | |
dc.contributor.funder | European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program | |
dc.contributor.funder | Danish National Research Foundation | |
dc.contributor.funder | BMBF | |
dc.contributor.funder | Carlsberg Foundation | |
dc.contributor.funder | Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness | |
dc.contributor.funder | University of Zurich |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
BC3 Journal Articles
-
OpenAire
European Commission