Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMontoya, D.
dc.contributor.authorHaegeman, B.
dc.contributor.authorDe Mazancourt, C.
dc.contributor.authorGaba, S.
dc.contributor.authorLoreau, M.
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-28T09:11:24Z
dc.date.available2023-08-28T09:11:24Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-01
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Ecology: 109 (8): 2991-3006-3006 (2021)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/62240
dc.descriptionEnsuring stable food supplies is a major challenge for the 21st century. There is consensus that increased food production is necessary, but not sufficient, to achieve food security, and that agriculture should also aim at stabilizing crop production over time. In this context, biodiversity-based approaches to food security are increasingly being supported based on the fact that biodiversity can increase and stabilize crop production. However, agricultural systems are often highly fragmented and our current understanding of how such fragmentation affects biodiversity and food production remains incomplete, thus limiting our capacity to manage agricultural landscapes for food security. We developed a spatially explicit model of crop dynamics to investigate how the fragmentation of natural habitats for agricultural conversion impacts food production and food security, with a focus on animal-dependent crop production. Fragmentation produces a variety of spatial and biodiversity-mediated effects that affect both the mean and stability (temporal invariability) of animal-dependent crop production. Fragmentation has a dual effect on animal-dependent production. On the one hand, spatial aggregation of natural land decreases animal-dependent production by reducing the Landscape Pollination Potential, a metric that captures fragmentation and pollinator spillover effects within the agricultural landscape. But aggregation increases animal-dependent production by maintaining a higher pollinator diversity in larger fragments of natural habitat. The net effects of fragmentation on animal-dependent crop production depend on the land-use change pattern, the strength of the pollinator spillover to crop land and the animal pollination dependence of crops. Synthesis. Our study sheds new light in the food security debate by showing that high and stable crop production depends on biodiversity and the spatial fragmentation of agricultural landscapes, and by revealing the ecological mechanisms of food security in crop pollination systems. Management for food security should consider factors such as pollinators spillover, the amount and spatial aggregation of semi-natural habitat and the animal pollination dependence of crops. This information would be useful to design agricultural landscapes for high Landscape Pollination Potential. These results are highly relevant in the global change context, and given the worldwide trends in agriculture, which shifts towards more animal-dependent crop production. © 2021 British Ecological Society.es_ES
dc.description.abstractEnsuring stable food supplies is a major challenge for the 21st century. There is consensus that increased food production is necessary, but not sufficient, to achieve food security, and that agriculture should also aim at stabilizing crop production over time. In this context, biodiversity-based approaches to food security are increasingly being supported based on the fact that biodiversity can increase and stabilize crop production. However, agricultural systems are often highly fragmented and our current understanding of how such fragmentation affects biodiversity and food production remains incomplete, thus limiting our capacity to manage agricultural landscapes for food security. We developed a spatially explicit model of crop dynamics to investigate how the fragmentation of natural habitats for agricultural conversion impacts food production and food security, with a focus on animal-dependent crop production. Fragmentation produces a variety of spatial and biodiversity-mediated effects that affect both the mean and stability (temporal invariability) of animal-dependent crop production. Fragmentation has a dual effect on animal-dependent production. On the one hand, spatial aggregation of natural land decreases animal-dependent production by reducing the Landscape Pollination Potential, a metric that captures fragmentation and pollinator spillover effects within the agricultural landscape. But aggregation increases animal-dependent production by maintaining a higher pollinator diversity in larger fragments of natural habitat. The net effects of fragmentation on animal-dependent crop production depend on the land-use change pattern, the strength of the pollinator spillover to crop land and the animal pollination dependence of crops. Synthesis. Our study sheds new light in the food security debate by showing that high and stable crop production depends on biodiversity and the spatial fragmentation of agricultural landscapes, and by revealing the ecological mechanisms of food security in crop pollination systems. Management for food security should consider factors such as pollinators spillover, the amount and spatial aggregation of semi-natural habitat and the animal pollination dependence of crops. This information would be useful to design agricultural landscapes for high Landscape Pollination Potential. These results are highly relevant in the global change context, and given the worldwide trends in agriculture, which shifts towards more animal-dependent crop production. © 2021 British Ecological Society.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipD.M. was funded by the European Union and Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE) in the framework of the Marie‐Curie FP7 COFUND People Program, through the award of an AgreenSkills/AgreenSkills+ fellowship, and by and the FRAGCLIM Consolidator Grant, funded by the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement number 726176). This work was supported by the TULIP Laboratory of Excellence (ANR‐10‐LABX‐41) and by the BIOSTASES Advanced Grant funded by the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 666971)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherJournal of Ecologyes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/726176es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectbiodiversityes_ES
dc.subjectecosystem serviceses_ES
dc.subjectfood securityes_ES
dc.subjectglobal changees_ES
dc.subjecthabitat fragmentationes_ES
dc.subjectpollinationes_ES
dc.subjectstabilityes_ES
dc.titleHabitat fragmentation and food security in crop pollination systemses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2021 British Ecological Societyes_ES
dc.rights.holderAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España*
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13713es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2745.13713
dc.contributor.funderINRAE
dc.contributor.funderInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
dc.contributor.funderTULIP Laboratory of Excellence
dc.contributor.funderFP7
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Union
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Research Council
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

© 2021 British Ecological Society
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2021 British Ecological Society