Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMedeiros,Joyseen
dc.contributor.authorDunabeitia, Jon Andonien
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-16T10:49:04Z
dc.date.available2016-11-16T10:49:04Z
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology 7: 1585-1585 (2016)
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/19537
dc.descriptionThe Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01585
dc.descriptionPublished: 14 October 2016
dc.description.abstractThe present study explores the role of individual differences in polymorphemic word recognition. Participants completed a masked priming lexical decision experiment on suffixed words in which targets could be preceded by suffix-related words (words sharing the same suffix) or by affixed primes with a different suffix. Participants also completed a monomorphemic word lexical decision and were divided in two groups (fast and slow readers) according to their performance in this task. When the suffix priming data were analyzed taking into consideration participants' reading speed as a proxy for their greater reliance on orthography or on semantics, a significant interaction between reading speed and the magnitude of the masked suffix priming effects emerged. Only slow participants showed significant priming effects, whereas faster participants showed negligible masked suffix priming effects. These results demonstrate that different reading profiles modulate the access to morphological information in a qualitatively different manner and that individual differences in reading determine the manner in which polymorphemic words are processed.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectmorphological processingen
dc.subjectindividual differencesen
dc.subjectsuffix primingen
dc.subjectmasked primingen
dc.subjectsemanticsen
dc.titleNot everybody sees the ness in the darkness: individual differences in masked suffix primingen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2016 Medeiros and Duñabeitia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/journal/psychologyen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01585
dc.contributor.funderThis research has been partially funded by grants PSI2015-65689-P and SEV-2015-0490 from the Spanish Government, PI2015-1-27 from the Basque Government, AThEME-613465 from the European Union, ERC-AdG-295362 grant from the European Research Council, a grant from the Fundación BBVA and BEX 1692-13-5 grant from the CAPES Foundation.
dc.subject.categoriaPSYCHOLOGY


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2016 Medeiros and Duñabeitia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2016 Medeiros and Duñabeitia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.