Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYee, Eiling
dc.contributor.authorThompson-Schill, Sharon L.
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-26T11:17:52Z
dc.date.available2017-09-26T11:17:52Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationYee, E. & Thompson-Schill, S.L. Psychon Bull Rev (2016) 23: 1015. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0948-7es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1069-9384
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/22691
dc.descriptionPublished online: 9 June 2016es_ES
dc.description.abstractAt first glance, conceptual representations (e.g., our internal notion of the object Blemon^) seem static; we have the impression that there is something that the concept lemon Bmeans^ (a sour, yellow, football-shaped citrus fruit) and that this meaning does not vary. Research in semantic memory has traditionally taken this Bstatic^ perspective. Consequently, only effects demonstrated across a variety of contexts have typically been considered informative regarding the architecture of the semantic system. In this review, we take the opposite approach: We review instances of context-dependent conceptual activation at many different timescales—from long-term experience, to recent experience, to the current task goals, to the unfolding process of conceptual activation itself—and suggest that the pervasive effects of context across all of these timescales indicate that rather than being static, conceptual representations are constantly changing and are inextricably linked to their contexts.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPsychonomic Bulletin & Reviewes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectEmbodied cognitiones_ES
dc.subjectSemantic memoryes_ES
dc.titlePutting concepts into contextes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2015es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/journal/13423es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13423-015-0948-7


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record