Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGiezen, Marcel R.
dc.contributor.authorCostello, Brendan
dc.contributor.authorCarreiras, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-22T11:47:05Z
dc.date.available2017-11-22T11:47:05Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationGiezen, M., Costello, B., & Carreiras, M. (n.d.). Why space is not one-dimensional: Location may be categorical and imagistic. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40. doi:10.1017/S0140525X15002915es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0140-525X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/23632
dc.descriptionPublished online: 26 April 2017es_ES
dc.description.abstractIn our commentary, we raise concerns with the idea that location should be considered a gestural component of sign languages. We argue that psycholinguistic studies provide evidence for location as a “categorical” element of signs. More generally, we propose that the use of space in sign languages comes in many flavours and may be both categorical and imagistic.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBehavioral and Brain Scienceses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.titleWhy space is not one-dimensional: Location may be categorical and imagistices_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© Cambridge University Press 2017es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-scienceses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0140525X15002915, e56


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record