dc.contributor.author | Giezen, Marcel R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Costello, Brendan | |
dc.contributor.author | Carreiras, Manuel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-22T11:47:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-11-22T11:47:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Giezen, M., Costello, B., & Carreiras, M. (n.d.). Why space is not one-dimensional: Location may be categorical and imagistic. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40. doi:10.1017/S0140525X15002915 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0140-525X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/23632 | |
dc.description | Published online: 26 April 2017 | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | In our commentary, we raise concerns with the idea that
location should be considered a gestural component of sign languages.
We argue that psycholinguistic studies provide evidence for location as a
“categorical” element of signs. More generally, we propose that the use
of space in sign languages comes in many flavours and may be both
categorical and imagistic. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.title | Why space is not one-dimensional: Location may be categorical and imagistic | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | © Cambridge University Press 2017 | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0140525X15002915, e56 | |