dc.contributor.author | Caffarra, Sendy | |
dc.contributor.author | Wolpert, Max | |
dc.contributor.author | Scarinci, Dana | |
dc.contributor.author | Mancini, Simona | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-16T16:10:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-16T16:10:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Caffarra, S, Wolpert, M, Scarinci, D, Mancini, S. Who are you talking to? The role of addressee identity in utterance comprehension. Psychophysiology. 2020; 57:e13527. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13527 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0048-5772 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/42193 | |
dc.description | Issue online: 30 March 2020 | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | Experimental evidence suggests that speaker and addressee quickly adapt to each
other from the earliest moments of sentence processing, and that interlocutor-related
information is rapidly integrated with other sources of nonpragmatic information
(e.g., semantic, morphosyntactic, etc.). These findings have been taken as support
for one-step models of sentence comprehension. The results from the present eventrelated
potential study challenge this theoretical framework providing a case where
discourse level information is integrated only at a late stage of processing, when
morphosyntactic analysis has been already initiated. We considered the case of
Basque allocutive agreement, where information about addressee gender is encoded
in verbal inflection. Two different types of Basque grammatical violations were presented
together with the corresponding control conditions: one could be detected
based on a morphosyntactic mismatch (person agreement violation), while the other
could be detected only if the addressee's gender was considered (allocutive violation).
Morphosyntactic violations elicited greater N400 effects followed by P600
effects, while allocutive violations elicited only P600 effects. These results provide
new constraints to one-step accounts as they represent a case where speakers do not
immediately adjust to the addressee's perspective. We propose that the relevance of
discourse-level information might be a crucial variable to reconcile the dichotomy
between one- and two-step models. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme,
Grant/Award Number: H2020-MSCAIF-
2018-837228; Fundación BBVA, Grant/
Award Number: IN[18]_HMS_LIN_0058;
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad,
Grant/Award Number: IJCI-2016-27702,
PSI2014-54500, RYC 2017-22015 and
SEV-2015-490; Eusko Jaurlaritza, Grant/
Award Number: PI_2015_1_25; Gipuzkoa
Fellowship Program, Grant/Award Number:
FFI2016-76432-P. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 837228 | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Psychophysiology | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020- MSCA-IF-2018-837228 | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/IJCI-2016-27702 | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/PSI2014-54500 | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/ RYC-2017-22015 | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/SEV-2015-0490 | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | addressee identity | es_ES |
dc.subject | ERPs | es_ES |
dc.subject | speech comprehension | es_ES |
dc.title | Who are you talking to? The role of addressee identity in utterance comprehension | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | © 2020 Society for Psychophysiological Research | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14698986 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/psyp.13527 | |