Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLópez Zunini, Rocío A.
dc.contributor.authorBaart, Martijn
dc.contributor.authorSamuel, Arthur G.
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Blair C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-25T14:00:07Z
dc.date.available2020-03-25T14:00:07Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationRocío A. López Zunini, Martijn Baart, Arthur G. Samuel, Blair C. Armstrong, Lexical access versus lexical decision processes for auditory, visual, and audiovisual items: Insights from behavioral and neural measures, Neuropsychologia, Volume 137, 2020, 107305, ISSN 0028-3932, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107305.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0028-3932
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/42331
dc.descriptionAvailable online 13 December 2019es_ES
dc.description.abstractIn two experiments, we investigated the relationship between lexical access processes, and processes that are specifically related to making lexical decisions. In Experiment 1, participants performed a standard lexical decision task in which they had to respond as quickly and as accurately as possible to visual (written), auditory (spoken) and audiovisual (written þ spoken) items. In Experiment 2, a different group of participants performed the same task but were required to make responses after a delay. Linear mixed effect models on reaction times and single trial Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) revealed that ERP lexicality effects started earlier in the visual than auditory modality, and that effects were driven by the written input in the audiovisual modality. More negative ERP amplitudes predicted slower reaction times in all modalities in both experiments. However, these predictive amplitudes were mainly observed within the window of the lexicality effect in Experiment 1 (the speeded task), and shifted to post-response-probe time windows in Experiment 2 (the delayed task). The lexicality effects lasted longer in Experiment 1 than in Experiment 2, and in the delayed task, we additionally observed a “re-instantiation” of the lexicality effect related to the delayed response. Delaying the response in an otherwise identical lexical decision task thus allowed us to separate lexical access processes from processes specific to lexical decision.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Marie Curie Individual Fellowship 702178 by the European Commission to RALZ, MINECO grant PSI2017- 82563-P from the Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness to AGS, VENI grant 275-89-027 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) to MB, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant 502584 to BCA, and by the Basque Government through the BERC 2018-2021 program and the Spanish State Research Agency through Severo Ochoa excellence accreditation SEV-2015-0490 to the Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherNeuropsychologiaes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/MC/702178es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/PSI2017-82563-Pes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/SEV-2015-0490es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectVisual word recognitiones_ES
dc.subjectAuditory word recognitiones_ES
dc.subjectSingle-trial event-related potentialses_ES
dc.subjectLexical decisiones_ES
dc.subjectLexical processinges_ES
dc.titleLexical access versus lexical decision processes for auditory, visual, and audiovisual items: Insights from behavioral and neural measureses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/neuropsychologiaes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107305


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record