dc.contributor.author | López Zunini, Rocío A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Baart, Martijn | |
dc.contributor.author | Samuel, Arthur G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Armstrong, Blair C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-25T14:00:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-25T14:00:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Rocío A. López Zunini, Martijn Baart, Arthur G. Samuel, Blair C. Armstrong, Lexical access versus lexical decision processes for auditory, visual, and audiovisual items: Insights from behavioral and neural measures, Neuropsychologia, Volume 137, 2020, 107305, ISSN 0028-3932, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107305. | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0028-3932 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/42331 | |
dc.description | Available online 13 December 2019 | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | In two experiments, we investigated the relationship between lexical access processes, and processes that are
specifically related to making lexical decisions. In Experiment 1, participants performed a standard lexical decision
task in which they had to respond as quickly and as accurately as possible to visual (written), auditory
(spoken) and audiovisual (written þ spoken) items. In Experiment 2, a different group of participants performed
the same task but were required to make responses after a delay. Linear mixed effect models on reaction times
and single trial Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) revealed that ERP lexicality effects started earlier in the visual
than auditory modality, and that effects were driven by the written input in the audiovisual modality. More
negative ERP amplitudes predicted slower reaction times in all modalities in both experiments. However, these
predictive amplitudes were mainly observed within the window of the lexicality effect in Experiment 1 (the
speeded task), and shifted to post-response-probe time windows in Experiment 2 (the delayed task). The lexicality
effects lasted longer in Experiment 1 than in Experiment 2, and in the delayed task, we additionally
observed a “re-instantiation” of the lexicality effect related to the delayed response. Delaying the response in an
otherwise identical lexical decision task thus allowed us to separate lexical access processes from processes
specific to lexical decision. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by Marie Curie Individual Fellowship
702178 by the European Commission to RALZ, MINECO grant PSI2017-
82563-P from the Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness
to AGS, VENI grant 275-89-027 from the Netherlands Organization for
Scientific Research (NWO) to MB, Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant 502584 to BCA, and by the
Basque Government through the BERC 2018-2021 program and the
Spanish State Research Agency through Severo Ochoa excellence
accreditation SEV-2015-0490 to the Basque Center on Cognition, Brain
and Language. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Neuropsychologia | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/MC/702178 | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/PSI2017-82563-P | es_ES |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/SEV-2015-0490 | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Visual word recognition | es_ES |
dc.subject | Auditory word recognition | es_ES |
dc.subject | Single-trial event-related potentials | es_ES |
dc.subject | Lexical decision | es_ES |
dc.subject | Lexical processing | es_ES |
dc.title | Lexical access versus lexical decision processes for auditory, visual, and audiovisual items: Insights from behavioral and neural measures | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/neuropsychologia | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107305 | |