Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHeunis, Stephan
dc.contributor.authorLamerichs, Rolf
dc.contributor.authorZinger, Svitlana
dc.contributor.authorCaballero Gaudes, César
dc.contributor.authorJansen, Jacobus F. A.
dc.contributor.authorAldenkamp, Bert
dc.contributor.authorBreeuwer, Marcel
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T08:59:49Z
dc.date.available2020-10-22T08:59:49Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationHeunis, S, Lamerichs, R, Zinger, S, et al. Quality and denoising in real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback: A methods review. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020; 41: 3439– 3467. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25010es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1065-9471
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/47181
dc.descriptionFirst published: 25 April 2020es_ES
dc.description.abstractNeurofeedback training using real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI-NF) allows subjects voluntary control of localised and distributed brain activity. It has sparked increased interest as a promising non-invasive treatment option in neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive disorders, although its efficacy and clinical significance are yet to be determined. In this work, we present the first extensive review of acquisition, processing and quality control methods available to improve the quality of the neurofeedback signal. Furthermore, we investigate the state of denoising and quality control practices in 128 recently published rtfMRI-NF studies. We found: (a) that less than a third of the studies reported implementing standard real-time fMRI denoising steps, (b) significant room for improvement with regards to methods reporting and (c) the need for methodological studies quantifying and comparing the contribution of denoising steps to the neurofeedback signal quality. Advances in rtfMRI-NF research depend on reproducibility of methods and results. Notably, a systematic effort is needed to build up evidence that disentangles the various mechanisms influencing neurofeedback effects. To this end, we recommend that future rtfMRI-NF studies: (a) report implementation of a set of standard real-time fMRI denoising steps according to a proposed COBIDAS-style checklist (https://osf.io/kjwhf/), (b) ensure the quality of the neurofeedback signal by calculating and reporting community-informed quality metrics and applying offline control checks and (c) strive to adopt transparent principles in the form of methods and data sharing and support of open-source rtfMRI-NF software. Code and data for reproducibility, as well as an interactive environment to explore the study data, can be accessed at https://github. com/jsheunis/quality-and-denoising-in-rtfmri-nf.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipLSH‐TKI, Grant/Award Number: LSHM16053‐SGF; Philips Researches_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherHuman Brain Mappinges_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectdenoisinges_ES
dc.subjectfMRIes_ES
dc.subjectneurofeedbackes_ES
dc.subjectqualityes_ES
dc.subjectreal-timees_ES
dc.subjectreproducibilityes_ES
dc.titleQuality and denoising in real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback: A methods reviewes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holderThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10970193es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hbm.25010


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record