Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCespón, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorHommel, Bernhard
dc.contributor.authorKorsch, Margarethe
dc.contributor.authorGalashan, Daniela
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-17T14:43:40Z
dc.date.available2020-12-17T14:43:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationCespón, J., Hommel, B., Korsch, M. et al. The neurocognitive underpinnings of the Simon effect: An integrative review of current research. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 20, 1133–1172 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00836-yes_ES
dc.identifier.issn1530-7026
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/49148
dc.descriptionPublished online: 7 October 2020es_ES
dc.description.abstractFor as long as half a century the Simon task – in which participants respond to a nonspatial stimulus feature while ignoring its position – has represented a very popular tool to study a variety of cognitive functions, such as attention, cognitive control, and response preparation processes. In particular, the task generates two theoretically interesting effects: the Simon effect proper and the sequential modulations of this effect. In the present study, we review the main theoretical explanations of both kinds of effects and the available neuroscientific studies that investigated the neural underpinnings of the cognitive processes underlying the Simon effect proper and its sequential modulation using electroencephalogram (EEG) and event-related brain potentials (ERP), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Then, we relate the neurophysiological findings to the main theoretical accounts and evaluate their validity and empirical plausibility, including general implications related to processing interference and cognitive control. Overall, neurophysiological research supports claims that stimulus location triggers the creation of a spatial code, which activates a spatially compatible response that, in incompatible conditions, interferes with the response based on the task instructions. Integration of stimulus-response features plays a major role in the occurrence of the Simon effect (which is manifested in the selection of the response) and its modulation by sequential congruency effects. Additional neural mechanisms are involved in supporting the correct and inhibiting the incorrect response.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the Basque Government through the BERC 2018-2021 program and by the Spanish State Research Agency through BCBL Severo Ochoa excellence accreditation SEV-2015-0490 This study was also funded by Juan de la Cierva-Incorporación (Spanish government; JC) and European Commission (Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions 838536_BILINGUALPLAS; JC), by post-doctoral funding of the University of Bremen (DG; ZF 11/876/08), and by an ERC Advanced Grant (BH: ERC-2015-AdG-694722).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherCognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neurosciencees_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/SEV-2015-0490es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/MSC/IF/838536_BILINGUALPLASes_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/ERC-2015-ADG-694722es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectSimon taskes_ES
dc.subjectEvent-related potentialses_ES
dc.subjectElectroencephalogrames_ES
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulationes_ES
dc.subjectFunctional magnetic resonance imaginges_ES
dc.subjectSequential congruency effectses_ES
dc.titleThe neurocognitive underpinnings of the Simon effect: An integrative review of current researches_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2020, corrected publication 2020es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.springer.com/journal/13415es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13415-020-00836-y


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record