Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLuthra, Sahil
dc.contributor.authorSaltzman, David
dc.contributor.authorMyers, Emily B.
dc.contributor.authorMagnuson, James S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-26T11:49:30Z
dc.date.available2022-01-26T11:49:30Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationLuthra, S., Saltzman, D., Myers, E.B. et al. Listener expectations and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability: A pre-registered replication. Atten Percept Psychophys 83, 2367–2376 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02317-xes_ES
dc.identifier.issn1943-3921
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10810/55166
dc.descriptionPublished: 04 May 2021es_ES
dc.description.abstractResearchers have hypothesized that in order to accommodate variability in how talkers produce their speech sounds, listeners must perform a process of talker normalization. Consistent with this proposal, several studies have shown that spoken word recognition is slowed when speech is produced by multiple talkers compared with when all speech is produced by one talker (a multitalker processing cost). Nusbaum and colleagues have argued that talker normalization is modulated by attention (e.g., Nusbaum & Morin, 1992, Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure, pp. 113–134). Some of the strongest evidence for this claim is from a speeded monitoring study where a group of participants who expected to hear two talkers showed a multitalker processing cost, but a separate group who expected one talker did not (Magnuson & Nusbaum, 2007, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33[2], 391–409). In that study, however, the sample size was small and the crucial interaction was not significant. In this registered report, we present the results of a well-powered attempt to replicate those findings. In contrast to the previous study, we did not observe multitalker processing costs in either of our groups. To rule out the possibility that the null result was due to task constraints, we conducted a second experiment using a speeded classification task. As in Experiment 1, we found no influence of expectations on talker normalization, with no multitalker processing cost observed in either group. Our data suggest that the previous findings of Magnuson and Nusbaum (2007) be regarded with skepticism and that talker normalization may not be permeable to high-level expectations.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by NSF 1754284, NSF IGERT 1144399 & NSF NRT 1747486 (PI: JSM) and NSF BCS 1554810 & NIH R01 DC013064 (PI: EBM). This research was also supported in part by the Basque Government through the BERC 2018- 2021 program and by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación through BCBL Severo Ochoa excellence accreditation SEV-2015-0490. SL was supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowshipes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAttention, Perception, & Psychophysicses_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Basque Government/BERC2018-2021es_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/SEV-2015-0490es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.titleListener expectations and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability: A pre-registered replicationes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.holder# The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2021es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.springer.com/journal/13414es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13414-021-02317-x


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record