dc.contributor.author | Lo, Chia-Wen | |
dc.contributor.author | Henke, Lena | |
dc.contributor.author | Martorell, Jordi | |
dc.contributor.author | Meyer, Lars | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-19T09:05:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-19T09:05:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lo, CW., Henke, L., Martorell, J. et al. When linguistic dogma rejects a neuroscientific hypothesis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 725 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-023-00738-1 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.citation | Nature Reviews Neuroscience | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-003X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/66802 | |
dc.description | Published online: 11 September 2023 | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | Kazanina and Tavano argue that delta- band oscillations cannot be involved in multi-word or multi-morpheme chunking during language comprehension because the timing of syntactic structure is too variable (Kazanina, N. & Tavano, A. What neural oscillations can and cannot do for syntactic structure building. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 113–128 (2023))1. According to the authors, comprehension requires the formation of hierarchically organized non-adjacent dependencies between words or morphemes that arrive at variable points in time. Temporally regular chunking would break dependencies and disable the comprehension of compositional meaning. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | NATURE RESEARCH | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.title | When linguistic dogma rejects a neuroscientific hypothesis | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.nature.com/nrn/ | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41583-023-00738-1 | |